paid@billingprecision.com
Toll Free: 866.387.1841
Home Scheduling Care Plans SOAP Notes Billing

Audit Risk Press

Article - March 25, 2008 - Capitol Weekly

The chiropractic board, one year later

By Malcolm Maclachlan

It was just over a year ago that the Board of Chiropractic Examiners burst out of obscurity and onto the front pages of newspapers covering California state government. Members of the board and the staff leveled charges of corruption and mismanagement at each other, numerous lawsuits were filed, and legislators moved to reign in the board's autonomy. But with the board set to meet Thursday at its headquarters in Natomas, most of the people involved say it is well on its way to putting these problems behind it.

On Tuesday, the Bureau of State Audits released a 119-page report on the board, with plenty of blame to go around. It found serious problems with both the staff and the board members. This included Open Meeting Act violations and improper communications between board members. But it also found that the board had taken significant steps to address problems around management, procedures and enforcement actions against problem chiropractors.

Those problems had led the Legislature to cut the board budget in half last year, from $3.1 million to $1.5 million. This forced the board to cut its staff from 17 people to 6. On Monday, a bill to restore that funding - AB450 by Assemblyman Bill Emmerson, R-Redlands - cleared the Senate Business and Professions Committee by a unanimous vote.

The committee's chair, Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas, D-Los Angeles, was the legislator who had the board's budget cut in the first place. He and Emmerson made an agreement that Ridley-Thomas could recall AB450 to his committee if the state auditors report found anything unexpected. Now that the report is out, Emmerson said he expects his bill to have a clear path.

"The audit confirms my belief that the Board and certain appointed members have been derelict in their responsibilities and duties," Ridley-Thomas said in a statement on Tuesday.

He said restoration of the board's funding would be dependent on them following the legal counsel they're given by their DCA attorney. He also called for a follow-up of the audit in six months. Contacted Wednesday morning, Ridley-Thomas' office could not confirm whether the bill would be recalled to committee or not.

"I don't believe he will (recall the bill)," Emmerson said. "I think the new administration at the chiropractic board is taking care of the issues and resolving their problems."

The centerpiece of that new administration is Brian Stiger. Formerly a staffer with the Department of Consumer Affairs, Stiger has made a career as a "fixer" for troubled state boards. He was brought in last year and eventually become the board's executive director. He welcomed the committee vote, saying it would allow the board to comply with the recommendations from the state auditors report. Part of this effort would be hiring some new staff. With one possible exception, Stiger said, any former staffers would need to reapply if they wanted to come back to the board.

"We're very pleased and hopeful that this bill will make it all the way through to restore our budget," Stiger said, adding, "It's pretty difficult to initiate all the reforms without all of our funding."

At the time, disputes within the board largely pitted staff against board members and chiropractic professional organizations. By this measure, the chiropractors appear to have won. The two most controversial board members, Richard Tyler and Franco Columbu, remain in place. Both are friends of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger from his bodybuilding days. Tyler did step down from the board's chairmanship last year and is currently in a one-year grace period after the expiration of his first four-year term; he is eligible to be confirmed to a second four-year term.

Meanwhile, all of the board staffers at the center of the controversy have moved on. Former Executive Director Catherine Hayes is now a staff services manager at the DCA. Jana Tuton, the deputy attorney general once assigned to the board, is no longer listed in state salary databases; according to several people familiar with the board, she has retired from state service.

Full story





<= Read & Learn
Certified by
New Jersey Department
of Banking and
Insurance

© 2005 Billing Precision. All Rights Reserved